Hybrid 225PHEV

Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225

Plug-in hybridsaloonGENERATION Mk1, 2022

Power: 224 hp; 360 Nm
0 → 100 km/h: 7.9 s; VMax 233 km/h
Total range: -
Battery + Tank: 12.4 kWh; + 0 L tank

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture: 4 cyl.
Displacement: 1,598 cm³
Power: 224 hp
Couple: 360 Nm
Gearbox: Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Transmission: Traction

Battery and charging

Battery capacity: 12.4 kWh
Petrol cons. WLTP: 1.3 L/100 km
Conso thermique: 5.5 L/100 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h: 7,9 s
VMax: 233 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length: 4,805 mm
Wheelbase: 2,785 mm
Width: 1,865 mm
Height: 1,485 mm
Kerb weight: 1,720 kg
Cd: 0.29
CO₂ WLTP: 30 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

saloon plug-in hybrid among the best in segment: 2nd of 18 in Thermal cons. estimated (5.5 L/100).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Thermal cons. estimated, the Mercedes C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell (1st with 5.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE (1st with 3.4 s) takes the lead.

Go beyond this analysis

Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.

Running cost for your profile

Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.

Launch simulator

Long-distance trip

Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.

Simulate a trip

Chronos & accélération

0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.

Voir la performance

Where the C5 X Hybrid 225 stands against saloons plug-in hybrid

Comparison across 18 saloons plug-in hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.

Thermal cons. estimated2^e / 18

5.5 L/100

Min 8.4 L/100 · Volvo S60 T8 AWD RechargeMax 5.5 L/100 · Mercedes C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell

0–100 km/h17^e / 18

7,9 s

Min 8,2 s · BMW 320e xDrive TouringMax 3,4 s · Mercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

PHEVBMW 320e204 hp · 7.6 s PHEVSkoda Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245245 hp · 7.3 s PHEVBMW 330e252 hp · 5.9 s HEVVolvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic253 hp · 6.7 s

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

DieselBMW 320d190 hp · 7.1 s DieselBMW 320d xDrive Touring188 hp · 7.4 s PetrolBMW 320i184 hp · 7.1 s PetrolBMW 320i Sedan184 hp · 7.1 s PetrolBMW 320i Touring184 hp · 7.5 s HEVBMW 330d xDrive286 hp · 5.0 s

Popular duels involving the C5 X Hybrid 225

PHEVBMW 320e vs C5 X Hybrid 225204 hp · 11.2 kWh PHEVSkoda Octavia iV 1.4 TSI e-TEC PHEV 245 vs C5 X Hybrid 225245 hp · 10.5 kWh PHEVBMW 330e vs C5 X Hybrid 225252 hp · 11.2 kWh HEVVolvo V60 B5 AWD Geartronic vs C5 X Hybrid 225253 hp · 7.2 L

Continue with the Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225

The same car, from other angles.

Consumption
Consumption and annual running cost of the Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225
Motorway
Simulated motorway trip of the Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225: stops and duration
Performance
Performance of the Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225: 0-100 and lap times
0-100 in 8.0 s · 224 hp

Citroen C5 X Hybrid 225: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

How much does the C5 X Hybrid 225 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.