Among the 5 D-SUV plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the Wrangler 4xe ranks 4th of 5 in Electric WLTP range (51 km, behind the Jaguar F-PACE P400e), 5th of 5 in Combined range (51 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive30e), 4th of 5 in Thermal cons. estimated (10.2 L/100, behind the DS DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300), 5th of 5 in 0–100 km/h (6.4 s, behind the Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Recharge).
Wrangler 4xe
375 hp, 51 km electric range, 6,4 s 0-100 : among the 5 D-SUV plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the Wrangler 4xe ranks 4th of 5 in Electric WLTP range, 5th of 5 in Combined range, 4th of 5 in Thermal cons. estimated, 5th of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
375hp
637 Nm · 200 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.4s
VMax 177 km/h
Electric range
51km
WLTP
Battery + Tank
14.1kWh
+ 0 L tank
Full specifications Jeep Wrangler 4xe
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 200 hp |
| Combined power | 375 hp |
| Couple | 637 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 14.1 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 51 km |
| Charge AC max | 7.2 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 27.6 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 3.4 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 10.2 L/100km |
| EV range motorway | 41 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,4 s |
| VMax | 177 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,333 mm |
| Width | 1,894 mm |
| Height | 1,848 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,388 kg |
| Cd | 0.56 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 5 D-SUV plug-in hybrid, the Wrangler 4xe combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (mid-table), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the Wrangler 4xe through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
In the city: 51 km pure electric (mid-table)
With a full battery, the Wrangler 4xe drives in pure electric mode for the first 51 km WLTP - placing it 4th of 5 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Jaguar F-PACE P400e (65 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the Wrangler 4xe behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →PHEV vs HEV: when combustion takes back the lead
En dessous de ≈ 233 km par trajet, la Wrangler 4xe roule moins cher que le HEV médian du segment. Au-delà, le thermique reprend l’avantage.
Where the Wrangler 4xe stands against D-SUV plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 5 D-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Wrangler 4xe
Jeep Wrangler 4xe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
51 km WLTP announced - making it the 4th of 5 in autonomie du segment out of 5 models. The reference is the Jaguar F-PACE P400e (65 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Jaguar F-PACE P400e leads in Electric WLTP range (65 km vs 51 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Wrangler 4xe vs Jaguar F-PACE P400e duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.