Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT
131 hp, 9,2 s 0-100 : among the 19 B-SUV 2019–2023, the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT ranks 7th of 19 in Combined consumption, 4th of 19 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
131hp
230 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.2s
VMax 205 km/h
Cons.
5.4L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Opel Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 131 hp |
| Couple | 230 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,4 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,2 s |
| VMax | 205 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,265 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 19 B-SUV, the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT ranks (top 7 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 7th of 19 in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100), 4th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford Puma ST 200 (1st with 6.7 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.4 L/100 L/100 (7th of 19 in Combined consumption)
The Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT consumes 5.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS (4.2 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 19 B-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption
7eout of 19
0–100 km/h
4eout of 19
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Captur TCe 130 EDC
131 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
2008 PureTech 130 EAT8
131 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
HR-V e:HEV
129 hp · 0-100 9.6 s
2008 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6
136 hp · 0-100 8.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT
Take the next step
Find a Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Opel Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 19 B-SUV 2019–2023, the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT ranks 7th of 19 in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100, behind the Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS), 4th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s, behind the Ford Puma ST 200).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Mokka B 1.2 DI Turbo 130 8AT vs Hyundai Kona 1.6 CRDi 7DCT 48V 136 PS duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.