Among the 46 S 2018–2022, the 2020 911 Carrera S ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 24th of 46 in Top speed (307 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 24th of 46 in Power-to-weight (293 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ).
2020 911 Carrera S
449 hp, 3,4 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2018–2022, the 2020 911 Carrera S ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 24th of 46 in Top speed, 24th of 46 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador SVJ. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
449hp
529 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.4s
VMax 307 km/h
Cons.
10.6L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Full specifications Porsche 2020 911 Carrera S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 2,981 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 449 hp |
| Combined power | 449 hp |
| Combined torque | 529 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.6 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,4 s |
| VMax | 307 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,519 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,450 mm |
| Width | 1,852 mm |
| Height | 1,300 mm |
| Boot | 264 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,534 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 46 S, the 2020 911 Carrera S ranks (top 14 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s). 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,6 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 2.8 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.4 s 0-100 (14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 2020 911 Carrera S ranks 14th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (2.8 s).
Top speed: 307 km/h (24th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 307 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 2020 911 Carrera S stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche 911 992 range
Generation 992 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 992
Popular duels involving the 2020 911 Carrera S
Porsche 2020 911 Carrera S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador SVJ leads in 0–100 km/h (2.8 s vs 3.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 2020 911 Carrera S vs Lamborghini Aventador SVJ duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.