Macan
252 hp, 6,4 s 0-100 : among the 27 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan ranks 19th of 27 in Combined consumption, 16th of 24 in Tank range, 17th of 27 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
252hp
370 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.4s
VMax 229 km/h
Cons.
10.7L
/100 km
Tank
74.951118L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Macan
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 4 cyl. · Turbocharged |
| Displacement | 1,984 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance thermique | 255 hp |
| Combined power | 252 hp |
| Combined torque | 370 Nm |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10,7 L/100km |
| Tank | 74.951118 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,4 s |
| VMax | 229 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,681 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,807 mm |
| Width | 1,933 mm |
| Height | 1,623 mm |
| Boot | 18 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,770 kg |
| Cd | 0.347476701668803 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 27 D-SUV, the Macan ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 10.7 L/100 L/100 (19th of 27 in Combined consumption)
The Macan consumes 10.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 700 km (16th of 24 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Macan covers 700 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1214 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Macan stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 27 D-SUV marketed between 2015–2019.
Combined consumption
19eout of 27
Tank range
16eout of 24
0–100 km/h
17eout of 27
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q5 SUV
272 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Q5 Sportback
272 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
X3 xDrive30d
265 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
Model Y Long Range RWD
283 hp · 0-100 5.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Macan 95B.1 range
Generation 95B.1 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Macan
Take the next step
Find a Macan or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Macan: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 27 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan ranks 19th of 27 in Combined consumption (10.7 L/100, behind the DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8), 16th of 24 in Tank range (700 km, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 17th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (6.4 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
700 km on a full tank (10.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 16th of 24 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 10.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan vs DS DS7 Crossback BlueHDi 180 EAT8 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.