Q2 35 TFSI
150 hp, 8,6 s 0-100 : among the 11 B-SUV 2024–2028, the Q2 35 TFSI ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption, 6th of 10 in Tank range, 7th of 11 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
150hp
250 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.6s
VMax 218 km/h
Cons.
6.4L
/100 km
Tank
50L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi Q2 35 TFSI
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 1,498 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 150 hp |
| Couple | 250 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manual 6 rapports Manual |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,4 L/100km |
| Tank | 50 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,6 s |
| VMax | 218 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,208 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,588 mm |
| Width | 1,794 mm |
| Height | 1,502 mm |
| Boot | 405 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,295 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 146 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 11 B-SUV, the Q2 35 TFSI ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.4 L/100 L/100 (6th of 11 in Combined consumption)
The Q2 35 TFSI consumes 6.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 (4.6 L/100).
Tank range: 781 km (6th of 10 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Q2 35 TFSI covers 781 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1087 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Q2 35 TFSI stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 11 B-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.
Combined consumption
6eout of 11
Tank range
6eout of 10
0–100 km/h
7eout of 11
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145
145 hp · 0-100 10.2 s
Mokka A 1.4 Turbo 140 6AT
141 hp · 0-100 9.5 s
Duster Hybrid 140
140 hp · 0-100 10.1 s
2008 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6
136 hp · 0-100 8.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi Q2 GA range
Generation GA launched in 2016. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the GA
Compare
Popular duels involving the Q2 35 TFSI
Take the next step
Find a Q2 35 TFSI or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Audi Q2 35 TFSI: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 11 B-SUV 2024–2028, the Q2 35 TFSI ranks 6th of 11 in Combined consumption (6.4 L/100, behind the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140), 6th of 10 in Tank range (781 km, behind the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140), 7th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (8.6 s, behind the Audi SQ2).
781 km on a full tank (6.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 6th of 10 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 leads in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100 vs 6.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q2 35 TFSI vs Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.