Among the 7 B-SUV electric 2022–2026, the Avenger BEV ranks 4th of 7 in WLTP range (404 km, behind the MINI Countryman E FWD), 6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h (9.0 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Junior Veloce BEV).
Gen I · GENERATION 2024 → · SMALL SUV
JeepBEV
Avenger BEV
156 hp, 404 km range, 9,0 s 0-100 : among the 7 B-SUV electric 2022–2026, the Avenger BEV ranks 4th of 7 in WLTP range, 6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
260 Nm · 156 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.0s
VMax 150 km/h
Range
404km
WLTP
DC charging
-kW
Technical identity card
Full specifications Jeep Avenger BEV
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 156 hp |
| Combined power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 260 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 51 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 404 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,0 s |
| VMax | 150 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,084 mm |
| Width | 1,776 mm |
| Height | 1,532 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,601 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 7 B-SUV electric, the Avenger BEV ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the MINI Countryman E FWD (1st with 462 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior Veloce BEV (1st with 5.9 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 404 km WLTP (4th of 7 in WLTP range)
The Avenger BEV offers 404 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the MINI Countryman E FWD (462 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the Avenger BEV stands against B-SUV electric
Comparison across 7 B-SUV electric marketed between 2022–2026.
WLTP range4e / 7
404 km
Min 370 km · Alfa Romeo Junior Veloce BEVMax 462 km · MINI Countryman E FWD
0–100 km/h6e / 7
9,0 s
Min 9,0 s · Fiat 600e 156Max 5,9 s · Alfa Romeo Junior Veloce BEV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
600e 156156 hp · 0-100 9.0 s
e:Ny1201 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
Countryman E FWD218 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160159 hp · 0-100 10.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Avenger BEV
Frequently asked questions
Jeep Avenger BEV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
404 km WLTP announced - making it the 4th of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the MINI Countryman E FWD (462 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The MINI Countryman E FWD leads in WLTP range (462 km vs 404 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Avenger BEV vs MINI Countryman E FWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.