Nissan Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT

Essence hybridecompact SUVGENERATION J12, 2022

158 hp, 9,1 s 0-100 : among the 12 C-SUV hybrid 2020–2024, the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT ranks 6th of 12 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 11 in Tank range, 8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
158 hp
270 Nm, dont 16 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.1 s
VMax 200 km/h
Cons.
5.5 L
/100 km
Tank
55 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Electric power
16 hp
Combined power
158 hp
Couple
270 Nm
Gearbox
Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.5 L/100 km
Tank
55 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
9,1 s
VMax
200 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Kerb weight
1,440 kg
Cd
0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 C-SUV hybrid, the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 3rd of 11 in Tank range (1000 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X2 sDrive20d (1st with 1059 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (6th of 12 in Combined consumption)

The Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 1000 km (3rd of 11 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT covers 1000 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1059 km.

Where the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT stands against C-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 12 C-SUV hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption6e / 12
5.5 L/100
Min 6.8 L/100 · BMW X1 xDrive25iMax 4.8 L/100 · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Tank range3e / 11
1 000 km
Min 836 km · BMW X1 sDrive20iMax 1 059 km · BMW X2 sDrive20d
0–100 km/h8e / 12
9,1 s
Min 11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWDMax 6,5 s · BMW X1 xDrive25i

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

The full Nissan Qashqai J12 range

Generation J12 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the J12

Popular duels involving the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT

Continue with the Nissan Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT

The same car, from other angles.

Nissan Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT rank in its segment?

Among the 12 C-SUV hybrid 2020–2024, the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT ranks 6th of 12 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 3rd of 11 in Tank range (1000 km, behind the BMW X2 sDrive20d), 8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (9.1 s, behind the BMW X1 xDrive25i).

What is the range of the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT?

1000 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 11 in Tank range.

How much does the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Kia Niro HEV FWD instead?

The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Qashqai 1.3 MHEV 158 7DCT vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.