992 · GENERATION 2019 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

2019 911 GT3 RS

527 hp, 3,1 s 0-100 : among the 45 S 2017–2021, the 2019 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h, 16th of 45 in Top speed, 12th of 45 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,15115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

527hp

469 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.1s

VMax 311 km/h

Cons.

13.7L

/100 km

Tank

63.973429L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 2019 911 GT3 RS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureAtmosphérique
Displacement3,996 cm³
Puissance thermique527 hp
Combined power527 hp
Combined torque469 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage Automatique
TransmissionPropulsion

Consumption

Cons. WLTP13.7 L/100km
Tank63.973429 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,1 s
0 → 160 km/h6,90 s
VMax311 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,557 mm
Wheelbase2,453 mm
Width1,880 mm
Height1,297 mm
Kerb weight1,430 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 45 S, the 2019 911 GT3 RS ranks (top 12 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 12th of 45 in Power-to-weight (369 hp/t). 12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s), 12th of 45 in Power-to-weight (369 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (1st with 2.7 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.1 s 0-100 (12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 2019 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Nissan GT-R 570 R35 (2.7 s).

Top speed: 311 km/h (16th of 45 in Top speed)

Top speed of 311 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 2019 911 GT3 RS stands against S

Comparison across 45 S marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h12e / 45
3,1 s
Min 4,6 s · Porsche 718 CaymanMax 2,7 s · Nissan GT-R 570 R35
Top speed16e / 45
311 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight12e / 45
369 hp/t
Min 219 hp/t · Bmw Z4 M40iMax 524 hp/t · Ferrari 812 Superfast

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche 911 992 range

Generation 992 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 992

Compare

Popular duels involving the 2019 911 GT3 RS

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 2019 911 GT3 RS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 45 S 2017–2021, the 2019 911 GT3 RS ranks 12th of 45 in 0–100 km/h (3.1 s, behind the Nissan GT-R 570 R35), 16th of 45 in Top speed (311 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 12th of 45 in Power-to-weight (369 hp/t, behind the Ferrari 812 Superfast).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Nissan GT-R 570 R35 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.7 s vs 3.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 2019 911 GT3 RS vs Nissan GT-R 570 R35 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.