Among the 15 saloons electric 2022–2026, the ID.7 Pro S ranks 3rd of 14 in WLTP range (709 km, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD), 5th of 7 in DC charge power (200 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Performance), 14th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra AWD).
ID.7 Pro S
211 hp, 709 km range, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 15 saloons electric 2022–2026, the ID.7 Pro S ranks 3rd of 14 in WLTP range, 5th of 7 in DC charge power, 14th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
211hp
310 Nm · 211 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.5s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
709km
WLTP
DC charging
200kW
Full specifications Volkswagen ID.7 Pro S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 211 hp |
| Combined power | 211 hp |
| Couple | 310 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 86 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 709 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 200 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 14.9 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,5 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,961 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,971 mm |
| Width | 1,862 mm |
| Height | 1,536 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,285 kg |
| Cd | 0.23 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 15 saloons electric, the ID.7 Pro S ranks (top 3 in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 3rd of 14 in WLTP range (709 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (1st with 830 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Performance (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 709 km WLTP (3rd of 14 in WLTP range)
The ID.7 Pro S offers 709 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).
Charging: 200 kW DC (5th of 7 in DC charge power)
The ID.7 Pro S accepts up to 200 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Performance (250 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the ID.7 Pro S stands against saloons electric
Comparison across 15 saloons electric marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the ID.7 Pro S
Volkswagen ID.7 Pro S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
709 km WLTP announced - making it the 3rd of 14 in autonomie du segment out of 14 models. The reference is the Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD (830 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD leads in WLTP range (830 km vs 709 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the ID.7 Pro S vs Xiaomi SU7 Pro RWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.