971 · GENERATION 2019 · LIMOUSINE
PorscheICE

Panamera GTS

460 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 47 limousines 2017–2021, the Panamera GTS ranks 9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 47 in Top speed, 19th of 47 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,87815,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

460hp

457 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

3.8s

VMax 299 km/h

Cons.

12.8L

/100 km

Tank

-L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Panamera GTS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
Displacement3,996 cm³
Power460 hp
Couple457 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP12.8 L/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,8 s
VMax299 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,055 mm
Wheelbase2,949 mm
Height1,417 mm
Boot17 L
Kerb weight2,069 kg
Cd0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 47 limousines, the Panamera GTS ranks (top 9 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 5th of 47 in Top speed (299 km/h). 9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 5th of 47 in Top speed (299 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 12,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 315 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Panamera GTS ranks 9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 0.8 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S (3.0 s).

Top speed: 299 km/h (5th of 47 in Top speed)

Top speed of 299 km/h. The segment reference reaches 315 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Panamera GTS stands against limousines

Comparison across 47 limousines marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h9e / 47
3,8 s
Min 5,5 s · Bmw 840i ConvertibleMax 3,0 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo S
Top speed5e / 47
299 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw 840d xDriveMax 315 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo S
Power-to-weight19e / 47
222 hp/t
Min 164 hp/t · Porsche Panamera 4Max 329 hp/t · Bmw M8 Competition Coupe

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Panamera 971 range

Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 971

Compare

Popular duels involving the Panamera GTS

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Panamera GTS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 47 limousines 2017–2021, the Panamera GTS ranks 9th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 5th of 47 in Top speed (299 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 19th of 47 in Power-to-weight (222 hp/t, behind the Bmw M8 Competition Coupe).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Panamera Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 3.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera GTS vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.