Among the 47 limousines 2017–2021, the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo ranks 16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 7th of 47 in Top speed (288 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 20th of 47 in Power-to-weight (220 hp/t, behind the BMW M8 Competition Coupe).
Porsche Panamera GTS Sport Turismo
460 hp, 4,0 s 0-100 : among the 47 limousines 2017–2021, the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo ranks 16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 7th of 47 in Top speed, 20th of 47 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
460hp
620 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.0s
VMax 288 km/h
Cons.
13.1L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo
- Displacement
- 3,996 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 459 hp
- Combined power
- 460 hp
- Combined torque
- 620 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 13.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,0 s
- VMax
- 288 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,050 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,949 mm
- Width
- 1,938 mm
- Height
- 1,422 mm
- Boot
- 18 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,089 kg
- Cd
- 0.3
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 47 limousines, the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo ranks (top 16 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s), 7th of 47 in Top speed (288 km/h). 16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s), 7th of 47 in Top speed (288 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 315 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.0 s 0-100 (16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo ranks 16th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S (3.0 s).
Top speed: 288 km/h (7th of 47 in Top speed)
Top speed of 288 km/h. The segment reference reaches 315 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo stands against limousines
Comparison across 47 limousines marketed between 2017–2021.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Panamera 971 range
Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 971
Popular duels involving the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo
Porsche Panamera GTS Sport Turismo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Panamera Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 4.0 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera GTS Sport Turismo vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.