971 · GENERATION 2018 · LIMOUSINE
PorscheICE

Panamera 4S

440 hp, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera 4S ranks 11th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 30 in Top speed, 12th of 30 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,09115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

440hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.2s

VMax 286 km/h

Cons.

10.2L

/100 km

Tank

23.7L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Panamera 4S

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo
Displacement2,894 cm³
Puissance thermique446 hp
Combined power440 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.2 L/100km
Tank23.7 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,2 s
VMax286 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,050 mm
Wheelbase2,949 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,422 mm
Boot18 L
Kerb weight2,010 kg
Cd0.349460556032088
CO₂ WLTP208 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 30 limousines, the Panamera 4S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 5th of 30 in Top speed (286 km/h). 5th of 30 in Top speed (286 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 308 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.2 s 0-100 (11th of 30 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Panamera 4S ranks 11th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo (3.6 s).

Top speed: 286 km/h (5th of 30 in Top speed)

Top speed of 286 km/h. The segment reference reaches 308 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Panamera 4S stands against limousines

Comparison across 30 limousines marketed between 2016–2020.

0–100 km/h11e / 30
4,2 s
Min 5,5 s · Bmw 840i ConvertibleMax 3,6 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Top speed5e / 30
286 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw 840d xDriveMax 308 km/h · Porsche Panamera Turbo
Power-to-weight12e / 30
219 hp/t
Min 164 hp/t · Porsche Panamera 4Max 280 hp/t · Bmw M850i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Panamera 971 range

Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 971

Compare

Popular duels involving the Panamera 4S

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Panamera 4S: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera 4S ranks 11th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 5th of 30 in Top speed (286 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 12th of 30 in Power-to-weight (219 hp/t, behind the Bmw M850i xDrive).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Panamera Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 4.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera 4S vs Porsche Panamera Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.