Among the 10 limousines plug-in hybrid 2016–2020, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive ranks 3rd of 10 in Electric WLTP range (50 km, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo), 9th of 10 in Combined range (248 km, behind the Bmw 745Le), 8th of 10 in Thermal cons. estimated (10.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 745Le), 2nd of 10 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo).
971 · GENERATION 2018 → · LIMOUSINE
PorschePHEV
Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive
680 hp, 50 km electric range, 3,4 s 0-100 : among the 10 limousines plug-in hybrid 2016–2020, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive ranks 3rd of 10 in Electric WLTP range, 9th of 10 in Combined range, 8th of 10 in Thermal cons. estimated, 2nd of 10 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
680hp
850 Nm · 136 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
3.4s
VMax 310 km/h
Total range
248km
of which 50 km elec
Battery + Tank
14.1kWh
+ 21.1 L tank
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 8 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,996 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 550 hp |
| Puissance électrique | 136 hp |
| Combined power | 680 hp |
| Combined torque | 850 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 14.1 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 50 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 28.2 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 2.9 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 10.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 21.1 L |
| EV range motorway | 40 km |
| Total range motorway | 248 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,4 s |
| VMax | 310 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,199 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,099 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm |
| Height | 1,433 mm |
| Boot | 14 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,313 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 10 limousines plug-in hybrid, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (top 3 in segment), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 10 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s). 3rd of 10 in Electric WLTP range (50 km), 2nd of 10 in 0–100 km/h (3.4 s).
Less suitable for
Regular long motorway trips. Once the 50 km EV range is used up, the car runs on pure combustion at 10.7 L/100 - high for a PHEV in this class. On trips >300 km weekly, a BEV or HEV would be more efficient.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Electric WLTP range, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo (1st with 50 km) takes the lead. If the priority is Combined range, the Bmw 745Le (1st with 809 km) takes the lead.
In the city: 50 km pure electric (top 3 in segment)
With a full battery, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive drives in pure electric mode for the first 50 km WLTP - placing it 3rd of 10 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo (50 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive stands against limousines plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 10 limousines plug-in hybrid marketed between 2016–2020.
Electric WLTP range3e / 10
50 km
Min 38 km · Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformanceMax 50 km · Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo
Combined range9e / 10
248 km
Min 248 km · Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridMax 809 km · Bmw 745Le
Thermal cons. estimated8e / 10
10.65 L/100
Min 11.6 L/100 · Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformanceMax 6.04 L/100 · Bmw 745Le
0–100 km/h2e / 10
3,4 s
Min 5,5 s · Bmw 740Le iPerformanceMax 3,4 s · Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
760i xDrive544 hp · 0-100 4.2 s
A8 60 TFSI e quattro tiptronic 340 kW462 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
A8 L 60 TFSI e quattro tiptronic462 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
745e394 hp · 0-100 5.2 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Panamera 971 range
Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 971
Compare
Popular duels involving the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
50 km WLTP announced - making it the 3rd of 10 in autonomie du segment out of 10 models. The reference is the Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo (50 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo leads in Electric WLTP range (50 km vs 50 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Executive vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.